Drawing for GOOD HOUSEKEEPING

USPTO serial 75086475

GOOD HOUSEKEEPING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECK, LORETTA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD HOUSEKEEPING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry S. Agdern

BARRY S AGDERN THE HEARST CORPORATION959 EIGHTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009CD-ROMs on entertainment and education for children dealing with basic reading and math skills; pre-recorded videotapes and videocassettes on entertainment for kids featuring stories teaching basic valuesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2000PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Sep 29, 2000PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Mar 7, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2000EX5MSOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Feb 15, 2000EX5DSOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Nov 29, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 3, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 3, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 29, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 7, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 1, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 27, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 3, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 30, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance