USPTO serial 75086535
KOHLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOHLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WENDY K BUSKOP
WENDY K BUSKOP Buskop Law GroupP.O. Box 540008HOUSTON, TX 77254UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | musical instruments, wind instruments, and stringed instruments | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |