USPTO serial 75087423
ASAHISEIKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASAHISEIKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANFORD W. BERMAN
STANFORD W BERMAN JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | money handling equipment, namely measuring apparatus for determining the authenticity of coins, apparatus for analyzing paper currency with electronic pules, coin dispensing apparatus, and bill dispensing apparatus, vending machines; stamp dispensing apparatus; vending machines for dispensing cards featuring magnetically encoded data; and electrical mechanical parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |