Drawing for BETA-CALCO

USPTO serial 75087690

BETA-CALCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZERVAS, ALBERT JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETA-CALCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Byrna S. Silver

BYRNA S SILVER SYNNESTVEDT & LECHNER2600 ARAMARK TWR1101 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011electric lighting fixtures and fittings for commercial, industrial, and residential use, namely, ceiling lights, wall lights, uplighters, downlighters, spotlights, lighting tracks, floodlights, roadlights, precinct lights, water, dust and moisture resistant lights, flameproof lights, tabular lighting systems, and fibre optic lights; control gear for lighting fittings, all sold as a unit with lighting fixtures and fittings for commercial, industrial, and residential use, namely, ballasts, chokes, capacitors, transformers, lampholders, dimmers, inverters, igniters, diffusers, starters, starter holders, terminal blocks, reflectors, louvres, glass shades and covers, plastic shades and covers, material shades and covers, and presence detectors; and parts thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance