USPTO serial 75087722
THE VERY NATURALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE VERY NATURALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL, O'TOOLE, GERSTEIN, ET AL6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products, namely, baby and body oil; baby and talcum powder; cold cream; skin cream and lotion; skin cleansing cream and lotion; non-medicated lip balm; skin clarifiers; skin emollients; moisturizers, and soap; and sun block and sunscreen preparations; hair care products, namely, hair shampoo, conditioners, rinses, gels, styling preparations, and spray; and cosmetics, namely, eye and foundation makup; lipstick and lip gloss; mascara; rouge and blusher; cosmetic compacts and pencils; face powder; facial scrubs; eye makeup remover; astringents for cosmetic purposes; and nail polish and nail polish remover | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |