USPTO serial 75087916
QUIDAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUIDAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded audio cassettes and pre-recorded compact discs featuring entertainment in the nature of circus performances, pre-recorded video compact discs, pre-recorded digital audio and video tapes featuring circus and musical entertainment, decorative magnets | ACTIVE | Jan 14, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 6, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |