USPTO serial 75088386
INTERNETICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERNETICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London SW7 5NL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Greigg
RONALD E GREIGGSTE 220 727 23RD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | publications in video format featuring services available through the electronic media and the electronic network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information, and on-line publications in video format on subjects other than banking, accounting and financial services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |