USPTO serial 75088431
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SGS SOCIETE GENERALE DE SURVEILLANCE S.A.
Canton of Geneva, CH
Other trademarks owned by SGS SOCIETE GENERALE DE SURVEILLANCE S.A.
SGS SOCIETE GENERALE DE SURVEILLANCE S.A.
Canton of Geneva, CH
Other trademarks owned by SGS SOCIETE GENERALE DE SURVEILLANCE S.A.
SGS SOCIETE GENERALE DE SURVEILLANCE S.A.
Canton of Geneva, CH
Other trademarks owned by SGS SOCIETE GENERALE DE SURVEILLANCE S.A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine H. Stockell
CATHERINE H STOCKELL FISH & RICHARDSON PCCITIGROUP CTR 52ND FL153 E 53RD STNEW YORK, NY 10022| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | laboratory management for others in the petroleum and petrochemical industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |