USPTO serial 75088843
GUEST REFERRAL SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUEST REFERRAL SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shaukat Karjeker
SHAUKAT KARJEKER CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVESTE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | preselecting restaurants on a city-specific basis and providing information regarding these restaurants to hotels, convention centers, and displaying the information in booths at convention centers; the information including - menus of the restaurants in a book bound form for supplying to hotel and convention center guests; updated menus for inserting into the menu books; publishing and distributing a newsletter containing reviews of restaurants; distributing a critic's choice booklet describing each selected restaurant, providing business hours, address, telephone number, and type of credit card accepted; and providing a dining, catering and banquet directory that lists the selected restaurants with a brief description of the food and ambiance, along with a telephone number and address | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |