USPTO serial 75088945
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6L2, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNE L CORNELIUS
ANNE L CORNELIUS MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORP1133 19TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer-based information systems for computer-aided dispatch, records and corrections management, imaging, mobile computing, bar coding, outsourcing, siting and simulation, alerting, court records management, voice and data radio integration and emergency communications centers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing consulting services relating to computer-based information systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |