Drawing for BACKYARD STEAKHOUSE

USPTO serial 75089246

BACKYARD STEAKHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARD, JENNIFER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACKYARD STEAKHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RDSTE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 9, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 27, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 5, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 24, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 1, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance