Drawing for INTERNET@VAR

USPTO serial 75089570

INTERNET@VAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERNET@VAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea Van Kampen

ANDREA VAN KAMPEN INTERACTIVE ENTERPRISES, LLC100 QUENTIN ROOSEVELT BLVDGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing multiple user access to a global computer network for the transfer and dissemination of information concerning business strategies and issues and products in the field of technology; providing information concerning business strategies and issues and products in the field of technologyABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 2, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 20, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 20, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 9, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance