Drawing for VAPLINK

USPTO serial 75089591

VAPLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VAPLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HELEN L WINSLOW

HELEN L WINSLOW RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGERONE RODNEY SQP O BOX 551WILMINGTON, DE 19899

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in creating brochures, fliers, sales sheets, stickers, pamphlets, posters, billboards, computer-based presentations, slide presentations, visual aids, global computer communications network pages, pages for global computer communications networks providing hypertext links from server to server, Hypertext Mark-up Language (HTML) pages, local computer communications network pages, limited access global computer communications network pages, screen savers, and other visual communication devices for use in sales, promotion, advertising, education, and communicationACTIVE—
035preparing audio-visual presentations for use in advertising; electronic billboard advertising; advertising agency services, namely, promoting the services of the health industry by rendering sales promotion advice; and preparing audio-visual presentations, brochures, fliers, sales sheets, stickers, pamphlets, posters, billboards, computer-based presentations, slide presentations, visual aids, global computer communications network pages, pages for global computer communications networks providing hypertext links from server to server, Hypertext Mark-up Language (HTML) pages, local computer communications network pages, limited access global computer communications network pages, screen savers and other visual communication devices for use in sales, promotion, advertising, education and communicationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 1, 1999OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 6, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance