USPTO serial 75089642
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2001
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DO YOU YAHOO!??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SUNNYVALE, CA
SUNNYVALE, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | SOCCER BALLS AND BALLOONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |