Drawing for POWER FORMULA

USPTO serial 75089952

POWER FORMULA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER FORMULA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin F. Majestic

MARTIN F MAJESTIC MAJESTIC PARSONS SIEBERT & HSUEFOUR EMBARACERO CTR STE 1100SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003laundry cleaners and brighteners and dishwashing compoundsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 22, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 28, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 18, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 29, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 29, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 17, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 15, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 15, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 10, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance