USPTO serial 75090114
RICE MOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARD, JENNIFER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RICE MOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Collegedale, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN G. JANOSKI
STEPHEN G JANOSKI DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 300 SWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | non-dairy, rice based powdered food beverage mix used as a milk alternative | ACTIVE | May 13, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |