USPTO serial 75090214
EXSEED GENETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARD, JENNIFER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXSEED GENETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH D MURPHY
JOSEPH D MURPHY MEYER CAPEL HIRSCHFELD MUNCY JAHN ET ALP O BOX 6750CHAMPAIGN, IL 61826-6750UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | food starch | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |