USPTO serial 75090377
DTS DIGITAL SURROUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2471786Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2001
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DTS DIGITAL SURROUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA
Westlake Village, CA
Calabasas, CA
Westlake Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
William L. Johnson DTS, Inc.5220 Las Virgenes Rd.DTS, Inc.Calabasas, CA 91302Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digital video disc players | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Theater Systems, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Theater Systems, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by DTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Theater Systems, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DTS DIGITAL SURROUND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 10, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 10, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 1, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 1, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |