USPTO serial 75090583
EXPAND THE POWER OF YOUR NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPAND THE POWER OF YOUR NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. A. Ryan
R A RYAN LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INCP O BOX 1995150 ALLEN RD STE 2000LIBERTY CORNER, NJ 07938-1995Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications products, namely, telecommunications switches, multiplexers, concentrators; computer programs for managing telecommunications networks; voice and data transmitting and transceiving equipment, namely, telecommunication transceivers, central office and remote terminals, network multiplexers; data communication multiplexers and concentrators; digital loop transmitters and receivers, digital loop coders and decoders and concentrators; wired and wireless controllers for controlling the transmission and reception of telecommunications signals transmitted through wired and wireless telecommunications networks, wired and wireless transceivers, wired and wireless base stations; video teleconferencing products, namely, video transmitters and receivers, video compressors, coders and decoders, video display monitors, video cameras, loud speakers, microphones, keypads, coders, decoders, multipoint controllers, computer programs for operating the videoconferencing equipment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AG COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AG COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EXPAND THE POWER OF YOUR NETWORK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |