Drawing for Serial No. 75091534

USPTO serial 75091534

Serial No. 75091534

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75091534?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy E. Berge

AMY E BERGE MIDDLETON & REUTILINGER2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TWRLOUISVILLE, KY 40202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011barbecue grillsACTIVEMar 31, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 10, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 3, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 25, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 11, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance