USPTO serial 75091879
NCP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NCP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sandown 2196, Sandton, Gauteng, ZA
Sandown 2196, Sandton, Gauteng, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Sommers
MARK S SOMMERS FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | alcohols and solvents, namely, rectified spirits, aerosol alcohol, denatured alcohols, methylated spirits, ethyl acetates, butyl acetates, specialist solvent acetates, diacetone alcohol, hexylene glycol, methyl isobutyl ketone, organic acids, namely, acetic acid, monochloroacetic acid; cardon dioxide, namely, liquid carbon dioxide, dry ice; inorganic acids, namely, hydrochloric acid; food acids, namely, malic acid, fumaric acid, tartaric acid, cream of tartar; artificial resins, namely, unsaturated polyester resins, phenolic resins; chlor-alkali products, namely, chlorine, caustic soda (lye and flake), sodium hypochlorite, calcium chloride, calcium hypochlorite; gases, namely, hydrogen; water treatment chemicals, namely, ferric chloride; ferric sulphate, polyaluminium chloride; organic flocculants, namely, polyamines (cationic liquids), polyacrylamides (anionic, non-ionic and cationic products); organic anhydrides, namely, phthalic anhydride, maleic anhydride; organic esters, namely, sodium formate, di butyl phthalate, di butyl maleate, di octyl adipate, di isodecyl phthalate; mining chemicals, namely, ion exchange resins, activated carbon, froth flotation reagents; precious metal chemical salts of gold, silver, platinum, rhodium, ruthenium, osmium, iridium, palladium and cobalt used in a wide variety of industries | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |