Drawing for Serial No. 75092220

USPTO serial 75092220

Serial No. 75092220

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75092220?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SABRINA C STAVISH

SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal tops for liquid containersACTIVEOct 10, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 2, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 2, 2000EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Mar 2, 2000EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
May 17, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 9, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 16, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 19, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 19, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance