USPTO serial 75092220
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SABRINA C STAVISH
SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal tops for liquid containers | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |