Drawing for IN THE ZONE

USPTO serial 75092517

IN THE ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IN THE ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY R COHEN

JEFFREY R COHEN FOX INCINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTP O BOX 900BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90213-0900

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028baseballs, baseball bats, baseball gloves; manipulative and jigsaw puzzles; dolls; action figures; puppets; hobby kits comprised of toy figure plastic molds, fasteners for attaching toy figure molds and decorative accessories for molded toy figures; toy vehicles; action figure play environments; action skill games; board games; balloons; swimming aids, namely, pool ringsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 9, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 13, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 15, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 16, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance