Drawing for IN THE ZONE

USPTO serial 75092522

IN THE ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IN THE ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mei-lan Stark, Esq.

MEI-LAN STARK ESQ FOX GROUP LEGALINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYPO BOX 900BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90213-0900

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016stationery, writing paper and envelopes; playing cards; trading cards; posters; tablecloths made of paper; napkins; party hats and party favors made of paper; desk calendars, wall calendars; greeting cards; coloring books; wrapping paper, gift tags; mounted and unmounted photographs; instructional and educational books in the field of sports, motion picture, video, television and film entertainment; children's books; game books; fiction novels and short story books; comic books; pre-paid telephone cards not magnetically encodedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 9, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 13, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 13, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 21, 1998OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 12, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 14, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance