Drawing for DB

USPTO serial 75093006

DB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007couplings for machines; industrial gearboxes, machine tools, namely, machines for shaving, shaping, hobbing, honing, boring, milling, reaming, shiving and abrading; toothed gears and gear trains for machines; gear cutters and abraders; variable speed gearboxes for machines; pumps, namely, centrifugal pumps, single-stage process pumps, two-stage process pumps, multi-stage vertical pumps, multi-stage horizontal pumps, high-pressure axial flow pumps, double volute multi-stage pumps for high pressure and high RPM applications, double volute multi-stage barrel pumps, and custom-made pumps of all of the aforesaid pumps; winches; back axles; earthworking, earthmoving and excavating machines; structural parts for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
012marine gearboxes; variable speed gearboxes for land and marine vehicles; automobiles; power transmissions for land and marine vehicles; clutches, brakes, torque limiters for land and marine vehicles; hydrostatic steering modules for land and marine vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2025CRAFAMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 23, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 2, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1998CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 2, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance