USPTO serial 75093428
Serial No. 75093428
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75093428?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
La Puente, CA
La Puente, CA
La Puente, CA
La Puente, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Connors
JOHN J CONNORS CONNORS & ASSOCIATES1600 DOVE ST #220NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-2427UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Indian grain based wafers, namely, jali wafers, plain wafers, masala wafers, yellow banana wafers, pepper banana wafers, masala banana wafers, cheese wafers, and poudina wafers; breads, namely, bhel puri, masala puri and farsi puri | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | restaurant and catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thacker, Jayshree Dilip
- Other trademarks owned by Thacker, Jayshree Dilip
- Other trademarks owned by Thacker, Dilip Ramanlal
- Other trademarks owned by Thacker, Dilip Ramanlal
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |