Drawing for PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 75093444

PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CATALDO, PETER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna C. Silva

ANNA C SILVA GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHERONE MONTGOMERY STTELESIS TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-4505

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009telecommunications equipment, namely, telephones with paging, computing capabilities, modems, cables, computer connectors, headsets, interface card modems for laptop computers, home base stations comprised of receivers, transmitters and antennas, pagers, personal digital assistants and other telephone accessories for automobile, home and office use, namely, remote telemetry transmitters for test management servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 15, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 10, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 7, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 24, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 11, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 24, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 1997CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Jul 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance