Drawing for Serial No. 75093682

USPTO serial 75093682

Serial No. 75093682

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75093682?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. MacMillan

RICHARD S MACMILLAN MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODDONE MARITIME PLZ FOURTH FL720 WATER STTOLEDO, OH 43604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019statues of stone and concreteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 4, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 14, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 6, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 10, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance