USPTO serial 75094090
STINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIT NELSON
BRIT NELSON SANTANGELO LAW OFFICE PC125 S HOWES 3RD FLFT COLLINS, CO 80521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | malt beer | ACTIVE | Apr 17, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |