USPTO serial 75094121
PARIS PERFECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARIS PERFECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Rochelle, NY
New Rochelle, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rocco S. BARRESE
ROCCO S BARRESE DILWORTH & BARRESE333 EARLE OVINGTON BLVDUNIONDALE, NY 11553UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair treatment preparations, namely, hair oils, hair conditioners, hair shampoos, hair gels, relaxers, hair sprays and permanents; skin care preparations, namely, skin toners, skin moisturizers, skin creams and skin oils; perfumes, colognes, toilet waters; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, lip gloss, lipstick sealer, lip balm, eye pencils, eyeliner, eye shadow, eyebrow pencils, mascara, foundation makeup, beauty mask, makeup remover, body powder, bath powder, talcum powder, sun-tanning creams, lotions and oils; nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish top coat, nail hardener, nail polish remover | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |