USPTO serial 75094516
SUN-RYPE OKANAGAN BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUN-RYPE OKANAGAN BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H. Deits
DAVID H DEITS SEED AND BERRY LLP6300 COLUMBIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | applesauce | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | iced tea; fruit leathers and fruit granola bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | pure fruit juice; fruit juices prepared from concentrates; frozen fruit juice; frozen fruit juice concentrates; fruit nectars; non-alcoholic fruit cocktails; non-alcoholic fruit beverages; non-alcoholic fruit drinks; non-alcoholic fruit juice blends; carbonated non-alcoholic fruit juices and beverages; lemonade | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |