USPTO serial 75094651
SEA-RESULTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEA-RESULTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H GELLER
W TWR STE 40002425 W OLYMPIC BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin moisturizing, conditioning, smoothing, toning, firming, massage and cleansing creams and lotions; skin creams and lotions to protect the skin from wind, sun and environmental pollution; wrinkle smoothing skin care preparations, make-up remover, eye cream, skin masks, sun block preparations and sunscreen preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |