Drawing for HEALTHSOURCE

USPTO serial 75095044

HEALTHSOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHSOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES S COTROPIA

CHARLES S COTROPIA SIDLEY & AUSTIN717 N HARWOOD STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed educational materials covering health care topicsACTIVEMar 23, 1992
042providing health related and health care information through the dissemination of printed material of othersACTIVEMar 23, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 6, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 10, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 21, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 8, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance