USPTO serial 75095672
COTTONY POLYESTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEORGE, ANIL V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COTTONY POLYESTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry L. Coats
LARRY L COATS RHODES, COATS & BENNETT, LLP909 GLENWOOD AVE POST OFFICE BOX 5RALEIGH, NC 27602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | polyester fabrics, tablecloths not of paper, textile napkins, unfitted fabric furniture covers, table skirts not of paper, all made substantially or wholly from polyester | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |