Drawing for COTTONY POLYESTER

USPTO serial 75095672

COTTONY POLYESTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEORGE, ANIL V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COTTONY POLYESTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry L. Coats

LARRY L COATS RHODES, COATS & BENNETT, LLP909 GLENWOOD AVE POST OFFICE BOX 5RALEIGH, NC 27602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024polyester fabrics, tablecloths not of paper, textile napkins, unfitted fabric furniture covers, table skirts not of paper, all made substantially or wholly from polyesterABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 20, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 9, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 16, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance