Drawing for CA'SEC

USPTO serial 75095698

CA'SEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PESKA, KEVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CA'SEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MILTON OLIVER

MILTON OLIVER WARE FRESSOLA VAN DER SLUYS & ADOLPHSONP O BOX 224MONROE, CT 06468UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009mobile alarms, namely, burglar alarms, personal security alarms and fire alarms, and position-independent alarm systems, comprising detectors and portable alarm control unit and means for signal transmission there between for detection of motion or fire; security control units switchable between an owner-resident mode and an owner-absent mode; alarm emitters, namely, sirens, horns, and flashing lights; radio transmitters and receivers, and actuators which respond to received radio signals; signal control apparatus and monitoring apparatus; motion detectors; opening detectors; universal detectors; fire and smoke detectors; wireless remote control key operated switches; signal generating devices for testing whether a security systems is functioning properlyACTIVE—
012mobile alarms, namely, anti-theft alarms for air, water and land vehiclesACTIVE—
037installation, maintenance and repairing of alarm systems and security devices for others; installation of fire alarms, intruder alarms and access controls for othersACTIVE—
042design services in the field of security control, alarm control and access control systems for others, and consulation in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 9, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 19971.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Sep 19, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance