USPTO serial 75095953
DATAMATIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLEMBOCKI, ERICA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATAMATIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Plymouth Meeting, PA
Plymouth Meeting, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL & SKILLMAN1601 MARKET STSTE 720PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY CANDIDATE SUPPLIERS, BIDDERS, BUYERS, BUYING AGENCIES AND/OR CONSUMERS TO FACILITATE ORDERS AND PLACEMENT OF ORDERS, NAMELY SOFTWARE FOR BIDDING, BUYING, ORDERING, AND SELLING BY COMPUTER OVER TELEPHONE LINES AND OTHER TELECOMMUNICATIONS MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, NAMELY ELECTRONIC BIDDING, BUYING, ORDERING, SALES, PRODUCT AND CONTRACT INFORMATION AND OTHER PROCUREMENT INFORMATION, TO CANDIDATE SUPPLIERS, BIDDERS, BUYERS, BUYING AGENCIES AND/OR CONSUMERS TO FACILITATE ORDERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |