USPTO serial 75095958
XTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SALLY M ABEL
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & W2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for creating animation, sound, and graphics; computer software for developing business, educational, entertainment, and multimedia software; computer software for use in three-dimensional modeling, imaging, and animation; computer software for desktop publishing; computer software for use in video and motion picture production; user manuals supplied as a unit with the foregoing, excluding from the foregoing travel industry related software and software specifically designed or promoted for use in developing travel industry related products and services | ACTIVE | Mar 14, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |