USPTO serial 75096286
WINEXPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINEXPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Van Kampen
ONE PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD-ROMs and compact discs containing publications featuring topics about computers, computing and electronic information services | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed magazines and newsletters, and supplements thereto and sections thereof, about computers, computing, and electronic information services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing on-line magazines, newsletters, supplements thereto and sections thereof about computers, computing, and electronic information services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff-Davis Publishing Company
- Other trademarks owned by ZIFF-DAVIS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff-Davis Publishing Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WINEXPERT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |