USPTO serial 75096328
TRANSCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRANSCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melvin J. Scolnick
MELVIN J SCOLNICK WORLD HEADQUARTERSPITNEY BOWES INCSTAMFORD, CT 06926-0700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; computer printers; transportation management software for use in controlling the movement of delivery of packages and parcels; and CD-ROMs containing transportation management software | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | education services, namely, providing seminars and workshops in the field of transportation management | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | consulting services, namely, designing computer software and integrated software programs for others; designing turnkey software and hardware solutions for others, and updating computer software, all in the field of transportation management | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pitney Bowes Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pitney Bowes Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRANSCAPE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |