USPTO serial 75096760
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN D RECTOR
SUSAN D RECTOR SCHOTTENSTEIN ZOX & DUNN41 S HIGH ST STE 2600COLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper goods and printed matter, namely leather covered or trimmed memo books, date books, address books, business document holders, organizers for business and personal use, checkbook cases, pocket secretaries, paper pad covers and cases, ring-type binders, and envelope holders | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | leather goods, namely, wallets; folders for holding money and/or credit cards, calling cards, business cards, and memos; passport cases; brief, attache, and travel cases; business card cases; calling card cases; key cases; billfolds; briefcase-type portfolios; leather cases for holding credit cards, business cards, or business material or combinations thereof, and cases for carrying or holding business cards | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |