USPTO serial 75097032
HEY ARNOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEY ARNOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MALLORY LEVITT
SELENE COSTELLO C/O A ARIES TABIGUEVIACOM INC1515 BROADWAY 51ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | GAME CARTRIDGES FOR COMPUTER VIDEO GAMES, COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES, AND COMPUTER GAME TAPES | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |