Drawing for DIGITAL BOULEVARD

USPTO serial 75097051

DIGITAL BOULEVARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL BOULEVARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Rosini

JAMES E ROSINI KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic publications recorded on CD-ROMS, audio and video cassettes, namely, magazines in the field of computer-related technology, information technology and high technologyABANDONED—
016magazines and newspapers and sections thereof and supplements thereto, newsletters, directories, brochures and pamphlets in the field of computer-related technology, information technology and high technologyABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 7, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 15, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 9, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 9, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance