USPTO serial 75097496
ZOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. West
FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA DAVID C. WEST4000 PILLSBURY CTR200 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed magazines in the field of education, yearbooks, memory books and school photography | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |