USPTO serial 75098634
IT'S WHO WE ARE IT'S WHAT WE DO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IT'S WHO WE ARE IT'S WHAT WE DO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Saul Leitner
SAUL LEITNER WIGMAN, COHEN, LEITNER & MYERS, PCTHE FARRAGUT BLDG STE 1000900 17TH ST NW 10TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded video tapes featuring topics of religious interest | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting training classes in the study of the Bible and Christian education; publishing books, magazines, newsletters and curricula for individuals, groups and churches; entertainment services, namely, a series of religious-based radio and television programs | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | ministry and missionary services, and consulting services related thereto | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, The
- Other trademarks owned by Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IT'S WHO WE ARE IT'S WHAT WE DO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |