Drawing for INFINITY.COM

USPTO serial 75098743

INFINITY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARMINE, F. D.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFINITY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORRISON & FOERSTER345 CALIFORNIA STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2675UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing on-line information concerning custom software featuring financial services databases for use in risk management, derivative trading, and other global banking applicationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 11, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance