USPTO serial 75098858
DYNO MARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNO MARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. McKee
JAMES W MCKEE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automotive parts, namely, engines, crankshafts, cylinder heads, water pumps, alternators, starters, brake shoes, brake pads, brake drums, brake rotors, brake calipers, brake kits, clutches, clutch disks, CV joints, facias, electrical fuel pumps, fuel pumps, oil pumps, master cylinders, body work and parts, wheel rim refinishing, electrical instrumentation, window wiper motors, window lift motors, power steering pumps, rack and pinion assembies, automatic transmissions and, standard transmissions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |