USPTO serial 75098949
SEND!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEND!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ STE 22002005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and computer software for sending and receiving data or messages for ordering goods and/or services; and arranging with third party establishments for the shipping and delivery of goods and/or services so ordered; and selling, transmitting, ordering and delivering said data and messages and/or goods and services including ancillary goods and services offered by them | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2000 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |