USPTO serial 75099013
PRO-MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2669386Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 31, 2002
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO-MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hampton, VA
Hampton, VA
Hampton, VA
Hampton, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl M. Davis II
Carl M. Davis II Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PCSix Concourse ParkwaySuite 3100Atlanta, GA 30328Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | NATURAL PROGESTERONE CREAM FOR USE AS A TOPICAL HEALTH SUPPLEMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Health Technologies Network
- Other trademarks owned by Health Network, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Health Technologies Network
- Other trademarks owned by Health Network, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named PRO-MAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 21, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |