USPTO serial 75099123
FASTSOLID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FASTSOLID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MASSACHUSETTS, MA
CARSON CITY, NV
CARSON CITY, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G DONALD WEBER JR
G DONALD WEBER JR LAW OFFICE G DONALD WEBER JR333 CITY BLVD W STE 1610ORANGE, CA 92868UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for defining solid model geometry in a CAD (computer aided design) database and displaying that solid geometry as lines, arcs, conics and splines on a computer graphic monitor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAYSTATE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FASTSURF, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FASTSURF, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named FASTSOLID
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |