USPTO serial 75099204
PICTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher S. Chalsen
CHRISTOPHER S CHALSEN MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; facsimile machines; computer operating systems for data communication, video communication, and text communication; laser printers; computer monitors; television sets; computer terminals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |